Installed and registered without problems on a Win 8.1.3 Pro 64 bit system.

A (Chinese) company without name and address. Digitally signed as Qiong Liu.

We had a previous version DAYU Disk Master Pro 2.2.7 on October 7, 2014. Here are the old reviews:
http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/dayu-disk-master-pro-2-2-7/

Upon start... what a shame! The company does not correct errors, mentioned in the comments from October last year. Negative!
http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/dayu-disk-master-pro-2-2-7/

The settings are in the help(?) section. Still the first setting: remember window size. A special setting for that???
http://i.imgur.com/EkABe6g.png

Disable the "customer experience" if you don't want to have unknown data sent to this unknown company.

With this tool you can backup& restore, zip files or folders, but no options for the zip - the options you select are those for the backups (in the zip section nonsense)
http://i.imgur.com/ikSUOkz.png

You have a S.M.A.R.T value reader. It claims to see errors, where other specialized HD control tools see a perfect system:
Hard Disk Sentinel Pro:
http://i.imgur.com/tGyVK6A.png

This software:
http://i.imgur.com/lDu0MaB.png

And you can create a RAMDisk:
http://i.imgur.com/0EKvqXo.png

Hmmmm. Today is Sunday, not a sunny day, but I'm in the mood to be very nice...

Uninstalled via reboot.

Karl  –  8 years ago  –  Avez-vous trouver ce commentaire utile ? oui | non (+141)

Traduire

Forgot the manangement picture, and wrong double URL...

http://i.imgur.com/2fbYoLf.png

Forgot the manangement picture, and wrong double URL... http://i.imgur.com/2fbYoLf.png
Save | Cancel

Karl  –  8 years ago  –  Avez-vous trouver ce commentaire utile ? oui | non (+44)

Traduire

Just few months ago I got a giveaway license of 'DAYU Disk Master Pro' from another forum. Downloaded the installer from official site and during installation it demanded the key , registered with the key flawlessly but after finishing Installation I could not open the interface . After waiting few minutes nothing was happened. Sometime splash screen came and disappeared. Couldn't locate the problem, Again and again tried with freshly installed (even freshly downloaded the installer ) program but the result was not changed.
Anyway my aim was to check its ramdisk feature as it has been recognized as a good 'ramdisk' program. It has a free version which I didn't try.

For 'Ramdisk' the freeware 'Softperfect RamDisk' caused 'BSOD' many a times. Switched to 'DATARAM RAMDISK' (free version limited upto 4 Gb disk) which I found really easy and efficient one .

As per Karl's recommendation I tried to use freeware 'ImDisk Toolkit' which really makes a good impression . But unfortunately it increased the boot time significantly. Now I have switced to 'GILISOFT Ramdisk' (paid program) which in the first run caused 'BSOD' but after a fresh installation it has never failed and caused any sorts of problem. Very easy to configure and it doesn't affect the boot time while the image is set to mount automatically with windows start. The ramdisk can be set to save to image with a predefined interval of time. It's really fast and reliable. I can conclude that 'ImDisk Toolkit' will be the recommended freeware undoubtedly while I have no complaint against 'DATARAM RAMDISK'.

Jahid  –  8 years ago  –  Avez-vous trouver ce commentaire utile ? oui | non (+61)

Traduire

"But unfortunately it increased the boot time significantly."

The boot time depends mainly on the data written to the RAM. It differs if you load a directory (with many files) or an image, which loads as fast as you copy 2 or 4 GB. The disadvantage of loading an ISO file is, that you have to built a new disk image each time, you change something in this file - e.g. a new FireFox version. The difference comes from different "loading options". I prefer for some reason the MicroSoft copy, because of more error detection.

Yahid, thank you for your excellent contribution for this forum!

"But unfortunately it increased the boot time significantly." The boot time depends mainly on the data written to the RAM. It differs if you load a directory (with many files) or an image, which loads as fast as you copy 2 or 4 GB. The disadvantage of loading an ISO file is, that you have to built a new disk image each time, you change something in this file - e.g. a new FireFox version. The difference comes from different "loading options". I prefer for some reason the MicroSoft copy, because of more error detection. Yahid, thank you for your excellent contribution for this forum!
Save | Cancel

Karl  –  8 years ago  –  Avez-vous trouver ce commentaire utile ? oui | non (+40)

Traduire

the only good:
- dramatically improved the speed for drive backups since last giveaway (at least on my main "Work"-system which is still XP...)
- a handy set of useful toos

BUT...
is faulty!
- on my system could and still can not mount a backup image of the system (C:)
- does NOT delete any image FOR REAL - even if had chosen "delete image" and those images vanished in the GUI.
- to many clicks for several tasks

BTW:
It´s mostly ever useful to read comments on earlier giveaways of offered tools (see Karl´s link above!)

sorry, but even if I see some good approaches: finally useless due to the faults and drawbacks.

wosa  –  8 years ago  –  Avez-vous trouver ce commentaire utile ? oui | non (+23)

Traduire